https://wijnandbaretta.com/tags/hugo/Recent content in Hugo on Wijnand Barettahttps://wijnandbaretta.com/images/og-default.pnghttps://wijnandbaretta.com/images/og-default.pngHugo -- 0.152.2enTue, 07 Sep 2021 09:24:42 +0200https://wijnandbaretta.com/posts/my-static-hugo-site-todo-list/Tue, 07 Sep 2021 09:24:42 +0200https://wijnandbaretta.com/posts/my-static-hugo-site-todo-list/<p>OK, I have my HUgo site running locally and it is working fine. The script I have created to <a href="https://wijnandbaretta.com/posts/create-post-via-shell-script/">create new posts from the command line</a> is also very nice. No need to cd into any directory, just type <code>bash $ new-post.sh </code>, give a name and some tags and my new post is created and my editor is opened with that post, with the frontmatter in place.</p> <p>The site is looking good, I&rsquo;m happy with it, there are however some things I&rsquo;d like to do to improve it further.</p>https://wijnandbaretta.com/posts/hugo-better-suited-static-site-generator/Wed, 01 Sep 2021 09:21:24 +0000https://wijnandbaretta.com/posts/hugo-better-suited-static-site-generator/<p>There are several static site generators that I have tried, and <a href="https://gohugo.io/">Hugo</a> is now up for review.</p> <p>It claimms to be the fastest, with pagebuilds of 1 ms per page. That is certainly impressive, but there are other aspects of Hugo that appeal to me.</p> <p>I have looked at <a href="%5BPelican%5D:">Jekyll</a> and [Pelican]. I like Jekyll because it is tightly integrated with Github pages, making it easy to launch a site. What I don&rsquo;t like about Jekyl is that it is written in Ruby, mainly because I don&rsquo;t know Ruby well enough.</p>